Justices have sided with the Trump administration in most emergency cases this term
Supreme Court justices ruled for the Trump administration in nearly three out of every four emergency applications decided so far this term.
24 wins + 2 half-wins (mixed rulings)
Includes US v. Shilling,
in which the Supreme
Court allowed the Trump
administration to enforce
a ban on transgender
service members in
the military
Includes Noem v. Kilmar Armando
Abrego Garcia, in which the
administration was ordered to
“facilitate” the return of a man who was
unlawfully deported to El Salvador
8 losses
Includes Trump v. Illinois,
in which the Supreme Court
blocked National Guard
deployment to Chicago
24 wins + 2 half-wins (mixed rulings)
Includes US v. Shilling,
in which the Supreme
Court allowed the Trump
administration to enforce
a ban on transgender
service members in
the military
Includes Noem v. Kilmar Armando Abrego
Garcia, in which the administration was
ordered to “facilitate” the return of a man who
was unlawfully deported to El Salvador
8 losses
Includes Trump v. Illinois,
in which the Supreme Court
blocked National Guard
deployment to Chicago
24 wins + 2 half-wins (mixed rulings)
8 losses
Includes US v. Shilling, in which the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce a ban on transgender service members in the military
Includes Trump v. Illinois, in which the Supreme Court blocked National Guard deployment to Chicago
Includes Noem v. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, in which the administration was ordered to “facilitate” the return of a man who was unlawfully deported to El Salvador
